[TS Lombard Report] Middle East Stagflation and AI Job Fears: Uncovering Market Misunderstandings
← Back to List

[TS Lombard Report] Middle East Stagflation and AI Job Fears: Uncovering Market Misunderstandings

[TS Lombard Report] Middle East Stagflation and AI Job Fears: Uncovering Market Misunderstandings

Subtitle: The Reality of the Oil Shock, Delayed Rate Cuts, and Fact-Checking the AI Hype

Original Report Date: March 6, 2026


3-Line Summary

  • Mild Stagflation Shock: Although oil prices have surged, this is not a 1970s-style crisis; Europe, highly dependent on LNG, will face a 50% larger inflation shock than the US.

  • Delayed Rate Cuts: With sticky service inflation already a problem, rising energy prices will stimulate inflation expectations, forcing central banks to push back their rate cut timelines.

  • AI Job Fears are Exaggerated: The recent hiring slowdown is due to cyclical factors like tariffs, and AI—still limited by 85% reliability—will merely 'assist' rather than 'replace' humans over the next five years.


In-Depth Report Analysis

Following US political uncertainty, which dominated macroeconomic discussions over the past year, the recently erupted Middle East war (Iran situation) has emerged as a new source of turbulence for global financial markets. In this report, TS Lombard (TSL) provides clear perspectives on the economic aftermath of the Middle East war, central bank responses, and the creeping fear of mass unemployment driven by AI.

1. No 1970s Oil Shock: The True Impact of Rising Oil Prices

The recent Middle East conflict has raised market concerns, driving oil prices up by approximately $40 per barrel. TSL analyzes that this will cause US headline inflation to rise by about 1 percentage point. This is because roughly half of the oil price increase is reflected in consumer prices, and energy accounts for about 6% of the overall inflation index basket.

However, this is not a catastrophic shock like the 1970s oil crisis. Compared to the past, major economies have a lower reliance on Middle Eastern oil, and oil intensity relative to GDP is three times lower.

Conversely, the situation is different for Europe, which relies heavily on Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG). With LNG prices rising much more sharply, Europe is projected to face an inflation shock 50% larger than the US.

Ultimately, TSL evaluates this event as a "relatively mild stagflation shock.". However, if the conflict drags on for months, TSL's previously forecasted "global economic re-acceleration" scenario will inevitably be delayed.

2. Central Banks' Rate Dilemma: The Clock is Pushed Back

Typically, central banks tend to ignore energy-driven inflation shocks unless they spill over into wage increases. Fortunately, labor demand in developed nations is currently cooling, making it difficult for workers to push through massive wage hikes.

The problem is that with service inflation already structurally high, a spike in energy prices could unmoor the public's "inflation expectations.". Therefore, TSL forecasts that central banks planning to hold rates will maintain their stance, while those preparing to cut rates will be forced to delay their timelines due to this crisis.

3. AI Will Not Steal Your Job: 'Assistance', Not 'Replacement'

Just six months ago, the market's biggest fear was "over-investment" by Big Tech building massive data centers without generating profit; recently, however, this has escalated into an extreme fear that AI will cause massive unemployment.

Yet, TSL firmly states that there is no evidence in US macroeconomic data showing AI is destroying jobs or rapidly boosting productivity. The recent sluggishness in hiring is merely due to "cyclical factors," such as margin pressures from tariffs and extreme policy uncertainty. The rising youth unemployment rate is simply hitting new market entrants in an economy experiencing a "no fire, no hire" environment, a phenomenon also observed in countries where AI adoption is slow.

In conclusion, because AI models still hover around 85% reliability and require human supervision, AI will ultimately "assist" rather than "replace" human labor. AI is expected to drive a gradual productivity improvement of 0.6 percentage points annually over the next five years, and massive corporate layoffs won't occur until the next "economic recession" hits.

4. The Path of Stocks and the Dollar: The Limits of US Dominance

Since the outbreak of the war, US equities have outperformed other markets like Europe. TSL analyzes this is because the US is a "net energy exporter" benefiting from rising oil prices, coupled with the unique psychology of US retail investors trying to buy the dip during geopolitical crises.

However, TSL predicts this US stock dominance will not last. If the Middle East crisis is resolved quickly without damaging economic growth, non-US stocks (especially in Europe), which have suffered steeper corrections, will rebound sharply and offer excellent buying opportunities. TSL maintains a generally positive global economic outlook and believes non-US stocks present great opportunities once the situation calms down.

The same applies to the US dollar. It is true that downside risks for the dollar have decreased due to reduced trade policy uncertainty following a recent Supreme Court tariff ruling and the mention of a hawkish figure for the next Fed Chair. However, TSL notes that the recent dollar strength is entirely driven by the short-term improvement in the trade balance enjoyed by the US as an "energy exporter.". Once the crisis is resolved, TSL's medium-to-long-term view is that the dollar will revert to a weakening trend.

5. Are Long-Term Treasuries the Best AI Investment? The Illusion of the 1990s

As bond yields spiked recently due to soaring oil prices, some bond bulls have called this a "buying opportunity.". They argue that long-term US Treasuries are the "best AI investment," believing AI will bring massive deflation similar to the 1990s internet revolution.

TSL strongly disagrees with this argument. The low inflation and falling interest rates of the 1990s were not solely due to technological advancements; they were the result of "rapid globalization" (the fall of the Berlin Wall, the dissolution of the USSR, free trade agreements) and a positive geopolitical environment.

Today's situation is entirely different. As the Middle East war demonstrates, the world is moving in the opposite direction, entering an era of frequent "negative supply shocks" due to geopolitical crises. In such times, the "term premium"—the additional yield investors demand to hold long-term bonds—should normally be higher. Despite this, TSL points out that the current bond market is not offering sufficient compensation for these risks.

StockHub Insight & Comments

This is a highly insightful report that refutes the vague fears dominating the market (the catastrophic fallout of the Middle East war, AI's massacre of jobs) with cold, hard data. It is particularly impressive how it pinpoints the oversold territory of European equities as an excellent future buying opportunity and sounds the alarm on the market's blind faith in rushing into long-term bonds. Beyond short-term trading in the energy sector, now is the time to proactively pay attention to non-US high-quality assets that will rebound sharply once the situation calms down.

📰 Related News